学会写文章—讲故事

学会写文章—讲故事

                                                                                      文/吕布凡

几乎所有做讲座、演说的“师”都会被他们的老师告知:要想吸引你的听众,你必须首先学会讲故事。没错,故事因为有人物、有情节、有始有末,听众没有理由在听了开始之后还能立刻离开,听众必然会为了谋求一个合理的、有意义的故事结尾去满足自己的好奇心。但是,是不是仅仅在演说里讲了故事就可以拿去做演说了呢,显然不是,还有语气、肢体语言、底气、普通话……等等能有助于发挥故事作用的附加因素。

同样,在写文章上,练习者务必不恩能够忽略去叙述故事,也同样,并不是在文章里里写了故事就可以称之为文章,文章里的故事像演说里的故事一样,还有各式各样的要求。比如,在我的文章里,如果提到故事,便会有至少3条指标去检验所叙述的故事是否合格。

  • 1.故事不俗套。

不拿经常用过的例子去叙述,同样,经常从大众嘴里传播的例子也不要从大众的角度去书写,另起角度或者替换人物、事件,按照自己新的意图去描述新事物,或者按照非常见的观点重新去阐述旧故事。

 

  • 2.故事可以发挥,但不要刻意肆意渲染。

写文章毕竟是文字书写,不同于做演说的情景,肆意的重复与强调并不见得能够渲染出该有的效果,适当地按照"出人意料”的情节、角度去说理倒是个不错的办法。

 

  • 3.故事能阐明中心。

这一点依然是区别去演说而言的,写文章的时候讲故事,意在把道理说明白,演说(尤其是即兴)的时候,常常会考虑气势的必要,例子的权威性,震撼效果,写文章固然也会考虑一二,但是,之所以落之于文字,按照书写是整理思路的理论来判定,那么阐述的逻辑应该更值得推敲,所以,之所以有必要把文章写出来,它必然是要通过书写讲出一个有意义的道理来,中心显然是大于演说所谓的“气场”效果的。

 

===========================================================================

 

为何而奔跑

怎么可以称之为“口才”?

 对话录1·虚荣到不自知

 对话录2·你只是太闲了

解孔子眼里“好听的话”

 对话录5·你在意的那些其实是什么?

 毕业,3年后的走与留

 满足,或是被满足

112 Comments

  1. The other posters are wrong. This is a GREAT piece. Thanks for sharing it to the interWebs. I love the second paragraph and the last couple. In my opinion, this is something that should be shared and if you have a blog, you should link to this. Thanks again.

  2. Thanks so much for giving everyone an extraordinarily superb possiblity to read articles and blog posts from this site. It can be so brilliant and also jam-packed with a lot of fun for me and my office colleagues to visit your web site particularly three times weekly to read the latest secrets you will have. And definitely, I am also actually happy with all the unique points you give. Some 1 tips in this post are completely the most impressive we’ve ever had.

  3. Thanks for making the effort to talk about this specific, I feel highly about it and also adore discovering more on that subject. If at all possible, as you acquire expertise, can you thoughts modernizing your blog with more information? It is extremely useful for me.

  4. What I wouldnt give to have a debate with you about this. You just say so many things that come from nowhere that Im pretty sure Id have a fair shot. Your blog is great visually, I mean people wont be bored. But others who can see past the videos and the layout wont be so impressed with your generic understanding of this topic.

  5. Wonderful good quality editorial! Definitely is essentially the most beautiful items of job I’ve find out a long while. Quite a few conditions creators don’t good care what we set up. It’s noticeable basically. Thank-you.

  6. I was curious if you ever considered changing the layout of your blog? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or 2 images. Maybe you could space it out better?

Comments are closed.